SMP Logo
SM Publications
Silver Salon Forums - The premier site for discussing Silver.
SMP | Silver Salon Forums | SSF - Guidelines | SSF - FAQ | Silver Sales


The Silver Salon Forums
Since 1993
Over 11,793 threads & 64,769 posts !!

General Silver Forum



Silver Salon internal search
or

REGISTER (click here) How to Post Photos


customtitle open  SMP Silver Salon Forums
tlineopen  General Silver Forum
tline3open  Opinions on monograms...to remove or not to remove?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

ForumFriend SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Opinions on monograms...to remove or not to remove?
durginlover
unregistered
iconnumber posted 02-06-2004 09:17 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I am a new collector of silver and I have fallen in love with some of the many beautiful older patterns by Durgin. It is impossible to find them without monograms. My question is ...is it better to purchase pieces in these older, rare patterns with monograms or to opt for the pieces that have a mono removal? How will a mono removeal effect the value of the piece? Any and all opinions are welcomed on this one!

IP: Logged

Paul Lemieux

Posts: 1792
Registered: Apr 2000

iconnumber posted 02-06-2004 09:44 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Paul Lemieux     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hello. I, too, enjoy collecting certain old Durgin silver. The company made so many great designs. (What are your favorite patterns?)

I don't think it is ever a good idea to get a monogram removal. Monogram removals tend not only to mar the finish and patina of a piece, but also to leave a telltale wavy surface. And since many collectors detest removals, they usually hurt an item's value.

I don't mind monograms, since they took great skill to create and are often beautiful in their own right. I doubt many places today could recreate some of the exceptionally intricate monograms produced 100 years ago.

My advice would be to avoid any item with a removal, unless it is so rare that you are unlikely to see that piece again in the near future.

IP: Logged

vathek

Posts: 966
Registered: Jun 99

iconnumber posted 02-07-2004 08:48 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for vathek     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Period monograms are a part of the history of the piece, and also say something about the aesthetics of that period. They should be thought of as an integral part of the design IMHO. I have a French sauce tureen which did have a coat of arms erased so the new owner could put their own mono on (probably around 100 years ago), which I would have preferred they not do, but I also accept that as being part of piece's history.

[This message has been edited by vathek (edited 02-07-2004).]

IP: Logged

Arg(um)entum

Posts: 304
Registered: Apr 2002

iconnumber posted 02-07-2004 11:34 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Arg(um)entum     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I share the attitude that monograms and inscriptions of some age, i.e. those done manually should be preserved particularly if they are well done.

But what about:
1) poorly done ones on otherwise attractive older pieces
2) 20th century ones done mechanically? A friend had a large inscription removed from a heavy mid-century piece. I agreed with her that it's an improvement but, ought we feel a twinge of bad conscience inasfar someone a couple of generations in the future may regret the removal of this original part of the piece's history?

I believe there is room for a range of defensible views on this topic.

IP: Logged

Paul Lemieux

Posts: 1792
Registered: Apr 2000

iconnumber posted 02-07-2004 01:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Paul Lemieux     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Arg(um)entum has a point that some monograms can be unskilled or ugly (I particularly agree about machine-made ones). I still would hate to get one removed though. It's such an irreversible step. Fortunately I have not encountered very many poorly done monograms (however once I did have a teaspoon meant to be a souvenir of Cincinnati, though it was engraved in unattractive lettering: Cincinateti).

[This message has been edited by Paul Lemieux (edited 02-07-2004).]

IP: Logged

Kimo

Posts: 1627
Registered: Mar 2003

iconnumber posted 02-17-2004 03:48 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Kimo     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
To me, a nicely done monogram does not detract from the value, and often they are so intricate they are almost impossible to tell just what the initial(s) actually is anyway.

A removed monogram or a poorly done monogram are damage in my mind and I wouldn't be interested in buying it even at a fraction of the price of a nice one unless I needed that particular piece so desperately that I was willing to live with it as a "place holder" until I could find a nice one.

IP: Logged

t-man-nc

Posts: 327
Registered: Mar 2000

iconnumber posted 03-12-2004 10:45 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for t-man-nc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Just My Opinion.... Monograms are the history of the proveance and should be left in tact.... Personaly any piece I get with a removed monogram (that I can detect) is a candidate for the melting pot with a few exceptions... A rare maker, A rare form, the only example I have of that maker and only until I can acquire another... will cause me to keep them...

From my point of view, Don't remove them, if you want a un-monogramed piece, them buy one, it's most likely cheaper....

"Smaug"

IP: Logged

All times are ET

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a


1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums.
Click here to Register for a Free password

2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development).

3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post.


| Home | Order | The Guide to Evaluating Gold & Silver Objects | The Book of Silver
| Update BOS Registration | Silver Library | For Sale | Our Wants List | Silver Dealers | Speakers Bureau |
| Silversmiths | How to set a table | Shows | SMP | Silver News |
copyright © 1993 - 2022 SM Publications
All Rights Reserved.
Legal & Privacy Notices