SMP Logo
SM Publications
Silver Salon Forums - The premier site for discussing Silver.
SMP | Silver Salon Forums | SSF - Guidelines | SSF - FAQ | Silver Sales

The Silver Salon Forums
Since 1993
Over 11,793 threads & 64,769 posts !!
American Sterling Silver Forum
How to Post Photos REGISTER (click here)

customtitle open  SMP Silver Salon Forums
tlineopen  American Sterling Silver
tline3open  Watrous-International Sterling flatware pattern "Ivy"

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

ForumFriend SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Watrous-International Sterling flatware pattern "Ivy"
ringboxlady

Posts: 95
Registered: Mar 2002

iconnumber posted 08-11-2006 10:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ringboxlady     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
[01-2501]

Hi,

Just checking to see if anyone knows anything about this pattern. The pieces I have are marked with Watrous' half moon mark and no mention of International silver, but a lot of people call it International Ivy. Anything would be helpful. I'm most interested in the years it was made and a list of pieces they made.

Thanks,
Ringboxlady

IP: Logged

Dale

Posts: 2132
Registered: Nov 2002

iconnumber posted 08-11-2006 10:52 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dale     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Could you post a photo so we can all make sure we are on the same page? Sometimes there are differences between patterns, particularly with IS and its many predecessors. This also helps us date things. Thanks, Dale

IP: Logged

rian

Posts: 169
Registered: Jan 2006

iconnumber posted 08-12-2006 01:58 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rian     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hello ringboxlady, is this the pattern you mean? This is the only piece I have and it has the Watrous marks also. I can't find this pattern in Turner. Both Hagan and Dolan list it as International patented 1911. Dale, could this have been a Watrous pattern that International reintroduced in 1911?

IP: Logged

ringboxlady

Posts: 95
Registered: Mar 2002

iconnumber posted 08-12-2006 02:48 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ringboxlady     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hi rian,

YES!! this is it!!!

I'm having a terrible time getting the picture to even load on my website. I tried all night. Thanks for helping me out here.

Thanks for the info you've posted and if you know anything else,
I'd be most appreciative.

Best,
courtney

IP: Logged

Dale

Posts: 2132
Registered: Nov 2002

iconnumber posted 08-12-2006 10:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dale     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Generally, when a company patented a pattern made by a predecessor there had to be minor changes to justify a new patent. IS could very easily have continued using the Watrous dies with the Watrous mark for many years, with only some slight cosmetic change. This seems to me to be based on the high cost of new die work: it was cheaper to continue using existing dies with an old mark, which seems to have been an IS speciality. Especially with the Watrous mark which shows up in production for a long period of time.

My basic reaction is that IS had a retailer problem with the Watrous market. Jewelers who had dealt with the high end Watrous line were probably not happy to have it taken over by the mass market IS. So, to justify continuing the pattern (which required a commitment to at least 25 years production) a new patent would be needed.

Perhaps some lawyer here can explain the situation. It can be the case that IS owned the dies, the name, production and selling rights, etc but not the patent. And could not renew.

Hopefully, others here will have a better grasp of the situation.

IP: Logged

rian

Posts: 169
Registered: Jan 2006

iconnumber posted 08-13-2006 06:40 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for rian     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Dale, thank you. Your knowledge of silver and the silver industry are amazing and invaluable. I think one of the regular contributers here is a retired patent attorney, but I can't remember who.

Courtney, my spoon is not very heavy, but I bought it anyway because I liked the pattern so much and it seemed so hard to find. How substantial are your pieces? If they are delicate it goes a long way toward explaining why there seems to be so little out there. On the other hand maybe I was just unlucky when I was looking. It matches my only piece of sterling holloware, a bowl by another maker with a similar leaf decoration.

IP: Logged

ringboxlady

Posts: 95
Registered: Mar 2002

iconnumber posted 08-13-2006 09:52 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for ringboxlady     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hi rian and dale!

Thank you both for your insight on the pattern. I am just wanting to make sure I know who the maker is and how to ask for it so I don't miss any.

As to the weight of my pieces:

rian-

I'm with you, not heavy at all. But the detail for me makes up for that. I have a meat fork, sardine fork, sugar spoon, and 6 demi spoons( you can imagine how light they are). The meat fork and sugar spoon have to be my favorite. The design of the pieces goes down the handle in the the bowl area or tines area, like I see on your beautiful piece. The other pieces don't have that, perhaps because the are too small or maybe it's the slight change in die which dale mentioned. Anyhow, they are all lovely. My 3 serving pieces have gold wash on them, does yours??? And rian, what is your piece called, a sugar sifter or slotted serving spoon, or?? It's GORGEOUS! Does it too have gold wash in the bowl?

Thanks everyone and keep bringing it. I love a good learning experience!
best,
courtney

IP: Logged

rian

Posts: 169
Registered: Jan 2006

iconnumber posted 08-14-2006 01:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for rian     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The spoon bowl is goldwashed front and back. I use it as a bon bon server, to serve candy from its (almost) matching bowl.

IP: Logged

ringboxlady

Posts: 95
Registered: Mar 2002

iconnumber posted 03-16-2008 06:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ringboxlady     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hi fellow SMPUBers!!

First let me say thank you to rian and jersey for their helping me to remember who I had talked to and when and where about this pattern.

I've since added some pieces to my collection and to quote myself "it's beginning to look a lot like Christmas in my silver drawer!!" I never thought I'd find this much.... so here is my problem. With this pattern, I'm having a problem deciding what I think some of these pieces are. What I think is a place spoon my mother thinks is a serving spoon. It measures 8 7/8". Note: all place setting pieces I bought as a set. Now take a look at the picture with the serving pieces from left to right this is what they measure.

  1. 5" bonbon,sifter of sorts?
  2. 5 1/2" i think a sugar shell
  3. 8 1/2" large serving spoon, it's name?
  4. 7 3/8" large serving fork, it's name?
  5. 5 3/4" fork, but what is it's name?
  6. 5" fork, but what is it's name?
I have a book by Dolan which I pour over constantly but I need clarification from someone who knows if my spoon is to eat with or serve with? If it is to eat with, is it a table spoon, a place spoon? I just don't know with the length what to call it. I know this is not an older pattern by most standards but it would be for me considering my other pattern is damask rose by Oneida. If you know of anyone with IS knowledge or a place or book which would serve me well, please suggest it.

I look forward to hearing from you!

Happy Easter!
ringboxlady

IP: Logged

jersey

Posts: 1203
Registered: Feb 2005

iconnumber posted 03-16-2008 07:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jersey     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hi ringboxlady!

I have a book I find helpful is "Yesterday's Silver for Today's Table" by Richard Osterberg. I find it a good reference for all types of flatware, with measurements, & it's uses. Perhaps it would help you. Check your library they may have it.

Jersey

IP: Logged

ringboxlady

Posts: 95
Registered: Mar 2002

iconnumber posted 03-16-2008 08:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ringboxlady     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks jersey! I'll do just that.

IP: Logged

All times are ET

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a


1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums.
Click here to Register for a Free password

2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development).

3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post.


| Home | Order | The Guide to Evaluating Gold & Silver Objects | The Book of Silver
| Update BOS Registration | Silver Library | For Sale | Our Wants List | Silver Dealers | Speakers Bureau |
| Silversmiths | How to set a table | Shows | SMP | Silver News |
copyright © 1993 - 2022 SM Publications
All Rights Reserved.
Legal & Privacy Notices