SMP Logo
SM Publications
Silver Salon Forums - The premier site for discussing Silver.
SMP | Silver Salon Forums | SSF - Guidelines | SSF - FAQ | Silver Sales

The Silver Salon Forums
Since 1993
Over 11,793 threads & 64,769 posts !!
20th/21st Century Silversmiths Forum
How to Post Photos REGISTER (click here)

customtitle open  SMP Silver Salon Forums
tlineopen  20th/21st Century Silversmiths
tline3open  The Gorham H840 Salad Set

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

ForumFriend SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   The Gorham H840 Salad Set
Brent

Posts: 1507
Registered: May 99

iconnumber posted 12-15-2007 08:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Brent     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote


Hello all,

Here is a fascinating bit of modern design from Gorham, circa 1930s. This sterling salad set is large, quite heavy, apparently hand-wrought,and very evocative of Danish designs of the period. Danish designer Erik Magnussen was working at Gorham at this time, and is is likely that he had some hand in this production. Magnussen produced a fair amount of objects at Gorham, most of them in limited quantities. As mentioned, this piece appears to be handwrought, with light hammer marks and the irregularities you only find in hand-made objects. Perhaps this was a prototype for a product line that never got off the ground? The design could have been produced in quantity, as Jensen mass-produced a lot of silver with similar hand detailing.

Regardless, a really fine example of American modernism!

Brent

IP: Logged

Richard Kurtzman
Moderator

Posts: 768
Registered: Aug 2000

iconnumber posted 12-15-2007 11:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Richard Kurtzman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Brent, Though not often found, this design was indeed put into production. This is the third such set that I have seen.
The H prefix was often used on cast pieces which tend to be of heavy gauge metal. I believe that this set was cast and that the hammering, which as I recall is mostly confined to the back of the bowl and tines, was done afterwards as part of the hand finishing process.
As to when it dates I am not certain.
In any case, I also think it is a great design and certainly not typical of Gorham.

IP: Logged

Brent

Posts: 1507
Registered: May 99

iconnumber posted 12-16-2007 11:42 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Brent     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hi Richard,

Thanks for the input! Nice to know that there are more out there. I wonder if they made any other pieces.

Most of the turn-of the-century Gorham H series pieces were indeed cast in thick gauge. However, not all were, as many of Gorham's die-struck souvenir spoons were given an H designation. Looking carefully at my set, and flexing the tines, I still think this set was at least die rolled and hand finished, rather than cast. There are faint hammer marks of varying sizes over the entire pieces, though they are more apparent on the backs. The loops would be pretty weak as well if they were cast. They could have started with a die rolled blank, fashioned the loop and hammered it for effect. I still lean towards hand wrought, though.

Thanks again, and please let me know if you see any other pieces!

Brent

IP: Logged

Richard Kurtzman
Moderator

Posts: 768
Registered: Aug 2000

iconnumber posted 12-17-2007 04:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Richard Kurtzman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Brent,
The H prefix was first used in 1898 when Gorham revised its marking system. For example, an item that had been previously marked 5, their Harlequin tongs, now became H5. These tongs happen to be cast, but the H prefix began to be applied to pre 1898 non-cast pieces as well. This may be the case with with the souvenir spoons. I am not
sure what criteria was employed to determine its usage.
I do know that there was a whole bunch of 1898 or later heavy cast serving pieces that we associate as being H series.
Regarding this salad set, you may be right that is was die cast. But jogging my memory further, I recall the the hammering was only on the back. I still believe that it was hand beaten not hand wrought.
Can we agree to disagree?

[This message has been edited by Richard Kurtzman (edited 12-17-2007).]

IP: Logged

All times are ET

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a


1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums.
Click here to Register for a Free password

2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development).

3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post.


| Home | Order | The Guide to Evaluating Gold & Silver Objects | The Book of Silver
| Update BOS Registration | Silver Library | For Sale | Our Wants List | Silver Dealers | Speakers Bureau |
| Silversmiths | How to set a table | Shows | SMP | Silver News |
copyright © 1993 - 2022 SM Publications
All Rights Reserved.
Legal & Privacy Notices