SMP Logo
SM Publications
Silver Salon Forums - The premier site for discussing Silver.
SMP | Silver Salon Forums | SSF - Guidelines | SSF - FAQ | Silver Sales

The Silver Salon Forums
Since 1993
Over 11,793 threads & 64,769 posts !!
American Silver before sterling Forum

A GLOSSARY of MILLED BANDS
Past American Coin Silver Forum topics/threads worth a look
WEV's American Silversmith's Family Tree Project Smith's Index

How to Post Photos REGISTER (click here)

customtitle open  SMP Silver Salon Forums
tlineopen  American Silver before sterling
tline3open  Inscriptions that enrich the spirit

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

ForumFriend SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Inscriptions that enrich the spirit
Ulysses Dietz
Moderator

Posts: 1265
Registered: May 99

iconnumber posted 07-22-2008 02:02 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ulysses Dietz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This pitcher, which I purchased for the Museum in 1992, was something I got in order to have an early silver pitcher (just as the water pitcher began to rise)

The style of the piece, high classical beginning to show signs of creeping rococo, was of prime interest. Boyce was a maker of no earth-shaking talent,



but good enough for my purposes. But what won me to this particular piece was the inscription:

noting its presentation by the Democratic Republicans on Washington's birthday in 1834 to Samuel Kip for keeping the elections honest. Mr. Kip, as an old man, gave this same pitcher to his grandson in 1880 for his 21st birthday.

IP: Logged

swarter
Moderator

Posts: 2920
Registered: May 2003

iconnumber posted 07-22-2008 05:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for swarter     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Interesting inscription = thanks for posting it.

I'm not familiar with the political structure in 1834, but in today's lexicon, "Democratic Republicans" would be the ultimate oxymoron. rolleyes

[This message has been edited by swarter (edited 07-22-2008).]

IP: Logged

Ulysses Dietz
Moderator

Posts: 1265
Registered: May 99

iconnumber posted 07-23-2008 09:05 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ulysses Dietz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
When I use this in a lecture, I always get a laugh with the Democratic Republicans...

IP: Logged

bascall

Posts: 1629
Registered: Nov 99

iconnumber posted 07-23-2008 09:41 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for bascall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Not to insult anyones "knowledge base," but just for convenience the Democratic-Republican Party is The party of Thomas Jefferson formed by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in 1792 which favored a strict interpretation of the Constitution to restrict the powers of the federal government and emphasizing states' rights.

IP: Logged

Scott Martin
Forum Master

Posts: 11520
Registered: Apr 93

iconnumber posted 07-23-2008 09:50 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Scott Martin     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
From:The History Encyclopedia
[history.com/encyclopedia.do?vendorId=FWNE.fw..de035500.a#FWNE.fw..de035500.a - link gone from the Internet]
quote:
Democratic-Republican party was the early political party in the U.S., originally led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison; it was the forerunner of the present-day Democratic party, which name it formally adopted in 1828. When the party was originally conceived in the 1790s to oppose the Federalist party, it was known simply as the Republican party (but should not be confused with the modern party of that name). The Republicans came to power in 1800 with the election of Jefferson as president. About 1824, led by Andrew Jackson, they adopted the name Democratic-Republican party. By the time Jackson was elected president (1828), the name had been shortened to Democratic party.

The philosophy of the Democratic-Republican party, also known as Jeffersonian Democracy, favored rural, agricultural interests, strong states' rights, and strict construction (that is, interpretation) of the U.S. Constitution. Democratic-Republicans upheld the legitimacy of the French Revolution and opposed close ties with England.


From: Encyclopædia Britannica
quote:

Democratic-Republican Party
political party,
United States originally (1792–98)
Republican Party


Democratic-Republican Party first opposition political party in the United States. Organized in 1792 as the Republican Party, its members held power nationally between 1801 and 1825. It was the direct antecedent of the present Democratic Party.

During the two administrations of President George Washington (1789–97), many former Anti-Federalists—who had resisted adoption of the new federal Constitution (1787)—began to unite in opposition to the fiscal program of Alexander Hamilton, secretary of the treasury. After Hamilton and other proponents of a strong central government and a loose interpretation of the Constitution formed the Federalist Party in 1791, those who favoured states’ rights and a strict interpretation of the Constitution rallied under the leadership of Thomas Jefferson, who had served as Washington’s first secretary of state. Jefferson’s supporters, deeply influenced by the ideals of the French Revolution (1789), first adopted the name Republican to emphasize their antimonarchical views. The Republicans contended that the Federalists harboured aristocratic attitudes and that their policies placed too much power in the central government and tended to benefit the affluent at the expense of the common man. Although the Federalists soon branded Jefferson’s followers “Democratic-Republicans,” attempting to link them with the excesses of the French Revolution, the Republicans officially adopted the derisive label in 1798. The Republican coalition supported France in the European war that broke out in 1792, while the Federalists supported Britain (see French revolutionary and Napoleonic wars). The Republicans’ opposition to Britain unified the faction through the 1790s and inspired them to fight against the Federalist-sponsored Jay Treaty (1794) and the Alien and Sedition Acts (1798).

Notwithstanding the party’s antielitist foundations, the first three Democratic-Republican presidents—Jefferson (1801–09), James Madison (1809–17), and James Monroe (1817–25)—were all wealthy, aristocratic Southern planters, though all three shared the same liberal political philosophy. Jefferson narrowly defeated the Federalist John Adams in the election of 1800; his victory demonstrated that power could be transferred peacefully between parties under the Constitution. Once in office, the Democratic-Republicans attempted to scale back Federalist programs but actually overturned few of the institutions they had criticized (e.g., the Bank of the United States was retained until its charter expired in 1811). Nevertheless, Jefferson made a genuine effort to make his administration appear more democratic and egalitarian: he walked to the Capitol for his inauguration rather than ride in a coach-and-six, and he sent his annual message to Congress by messenger, rather than reading it personally. Federal excises were repealed, the national debt was retired, and the size of the armed forces was greatly reduced. However, the demands of foreign relations (such as the Louisiana Purchase in 1803) often forced Jefferson and his successors into a nationalistic stance reminiscent of the Federalists.

In the 20 years after 1808 the party existed less as a united political group than as a loose coalition of personal and sectional factions. The fissures in the party were fully exposed by the election of 1824, when the leaders of the two major factions, Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams, were both nominated for president. Meanwhile, William H. Crawford was nominated by the party’s congressional caucus, and Henry Clay, another Democratic-Republican, was nominated by the Kentucky and Tennessee legislatures. Jackson carried the popular vote and a plurality in the electoral college, but because no candidate received a majority of the electoral vote, the presidency was decided by the House of Representatives. Clay, the speaker of the House of Representatives, finished fourth and was thus ineligible for consideration; he subsequently threw his support to Adams, who was elected president and promptly appointed Clay secretary of state. Following the election, the Democratic-Republicans split into two groups: the National Republicans, who became the nucleus of the Whig Party in the 1830s, were led by Adams and Clay, while the Democratic-Republicans were organized by Martin Van Buren, the future eighth president (1837–41), and led by Jackson. The Democratic-Republicans comprised diverse elements that emphasized local and humanitarian concerns, states’ rights, agrarian interests, and democratic procedures. During Jackson’s presidency (1829–37) they dropped the Republican label and called themselves simply Democrats or Jacksonian Democrats. The name Democratic Party was formally adopted in 1844.


IP: Logged

ahwt

Posts: 2334
Registered: Mar 2003

iconnumber posted 07-23-2008 10:09 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for ahwt     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
"Republicans Are Not Always Ungrateful" is another phase that sometimes creates laughter.




IP: Logged

Ulysses Dietz
Moderator

Posts: 1265
Registered: May 99

iconnumber posted 07-25-2008 09:23 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ulysses Dietz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Here is a tankard, made first in 1740 for some guy in Philadelphia by Joseph Richardson. In 1760 it is left to another guy, name of Cox, in Moorestown, New Jersey, in payment of a debt. From that point on, the Cox family inscribes the line of descent on the piece down the side--from a wedding in the 1790s right up to the Civil War. Some folks say it ruins the piece, but this curator thinks it keeps history alive. The monogram of the original owner is on the bottom (as it should be). An old debt becomes a family heirloom.


IP: Logged

Ulysses Dietz
Moderator

Posts: 1265
Registered: May 99

iconnumber posted 07-25-2008 09:31 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ulysses Dietz     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Here is another piece, a sugar bowl made in the 1750s by Elias Boudinot of Philadelphia. The original owner is lost, but it was obtained by a woman named Anne Dunkin, who proceeded to leave it to her first surviving granddaughter in the 1790s.

Subsequently, it was left to the eldest female child for the next eight generations, that girl's initials and birth date engraved on one of the rococo swirls of the body. It was only when the 90+ year old owner of it, who received it in 1912, couldn't bring herself to leave it to her only child--a boy--that she called me and asked if the Museum wanted it. The only known Elias Boudinot sugar bowl? Yes indeed (I think at least). One of my favorite objects, in which the engraving gives it a story richer than anyone could make up.

IP: Logged

argentum1

Posts: 602
Registered: Apr 2004

iconnumber posted 07-25-2008 11:09 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for argentum1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Sure does beat the daylights out of getting a watch.

IP: Logged

argentum1

Posts: 602
Registered: Apr 2004

iconnumber posted 07-25-2008 11:13 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for argentum1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Bascall
Wasn't T. Jefferson the first to use dirty tricks in a political campaign by hiring a writer to submit/print false stories about Adams.

IP: Logged

swarter
Moderator

Posts: 2920
Registered: May 2003

iconnumber posted 07-25-2008 12:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for swarter     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Ulysses Dietz:
Here is a tankard, made first in 1740 for some guy in Philadelphia by Joseph Richardson. In 1760 it is left to another guy, name of Cox, in Moorestown, New Jersey, in payment of a debt. From that point on, the Cox family inscribes the line of descent on the piece down the side--from a wedding in the 1790s right up to the Civil War. Some folks say it ruins the piece, but this curator thinks it keeps history alive. The monogram of the original owner is on the bottom (as it should be). An old debt becomes a family heirloom.


Unless a piece is seriously disfigured by it, anyone who says that provenance like that devalues a piece must have a warped sense of values. confused

Ulysses, thanks for posting these choice items for us all to see and appreciate.

IP: Logged

jersey

Posts: 1203
Registered: Feb 2005

iconnumber posted 07-25-2008 03:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jersey     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Make sure Wev sees this sugar bowl, I think he may be looking for the Boudinot hallmark to add to his American Silversmiths.

Have a great weekend!

Jersey

IP: Logged

bascall

Posts: 1629
Registered: Nov 99

iconnumber posted 07-26-2008 12:10 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for bascall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Here is a tankard, made first in 1740 for some guy in Philadelphia by Joseph Richardson. In 1760 it is left to another guy, name of Cox, in Moorestown, New Jersey, in payment of a debt.

...plate...is a sure friend at a dead lift.

William Fitzhugh speaking of silver. (Sorry I just like this reference. The entire quote could be the preamble for this forum)

IP: Logged

bascall

Posts: 1629
Registered: Nov 99

iconnumber posted 07-26-2008 01:16 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for bascall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by argentum1:
Bascall
Wasn't T. Jefferson the first to use dirty tricks in a political campaign by hiring a writer to submit/print false stories about Adams.

McCulloch's John Adams biography has both Adam's and Jefferson's parties going at each other in print unmercifully under "nom de plumes," and McCulloch does recount a particularly scurrilous character being paid by Jefferson to go after Adams, but I don't know who was first to use such tricks.

McCulloch's excellent book left me with the impression that nothing has changed in the conduct of politics over the centuries.

IP: Logged

swarter
Moderator

Posts: 2920
Registered: May 2003

iconnumber posted 07-26-2008 01:06 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for swarter     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
A reinterpretation as a thought for the day:

" 'All's fair in love and war' includes political campaigns, which are nothing more than a war of words."

. . . and you can quote me on that!

IP: Logged

All times are ET

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a


1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums.
Click here to Register for a Free password

2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development).

3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post.


| Home | Order | The Guide to Evaluating Gold & Silver Objects | The Book of Silver
| Update BOS Registration | Silver Library | For Sale | Our Wants List | Silver Dealers | Speakers Bureau |
| Silversmiths | How to set a table | Shows | SMP | Silver News |
copyright © 1993 - 2022 SM Publications
All Rights Reserved.
Legal & Privacy Notices