|
A GLOSSARY of MILLED BANDS
|
|
How to Post Photos |
REGISTER (click here)
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
![]() |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
Author | Topic: Mysterious strainer |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I'm posting this in the American pre-sterling forum because the seller told me it was Colonial Pennsylvania Dutch, but I'm not at all sure that's right. It's a straining or sifting spoon with a wooden handle. The interesting thing about it is the pattern of the pierced holes, which spell out "PETER + STEHELI [design] 1776." What do you folks think? Is this spoon American or from somewhere in German-speaking Europe? Is 1776 when it was made, or does it have some other meaning? Is this a tea strainer? A sugar sifter? Something else? With some other objects (including a teaspoon) for scale: There's an early repair, a patch on the inside of the bowl where the handle attaches: IP: Logged |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() IP: Logged |
ahwt Posts: 2334 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Great piece. The design certainly has a Pennsylvania Dutch look. I would write to one or two of the Historical Societies that are familiar with like art work like this to see if they any ideas. These can be frustrating as the piece was obviously made by a skilled silversmith who just did not mark it. Their skill at designing the strainer pattern I would think would mean they did many of these. IP: Logged |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thank you, ahwt. Do you think it's a tea strainer? I'm having trouble figuring out when spoonlike tea strainers were first used, but I have a feeling it was later than 1776. IP: Logged |
ahwt Posts: 2334 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I think your strainer may well have started out as a tea strainer, but if Peter was like me he would have used it for anything that needed straining. It is very pretty and would be hard not to use. From my limited knowledge it seems to me that the more interesting patterns of holes are on the early strainers - before 1800. That may not be a good way to judge the time it was made as it really is just a feeling. The wooden handle would also indicate to me the it is before 1800. In another post on your strainers I mentioned the Michael Clayton book. That book came out in a 1971 edition and a 1985 edition. The 1985 one has many more pages so I think I would get that one. When I brought my copy (1971) I did not know there were two editions. IP: Logged |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Thank you! I ordered the Clayton book, 1985 edition. IP: Logged |
Scott Martin Forum Master Posts: 11520 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I don't know the following as fact but over the years I've heard variations told several times. During the time (before banking) when people turned their savings into ever day items that they could keep an eye on. It was important to be able to identify the object as belonging to them. Scratch engraving or hole pattern decorating was less expensive and more available. Your object might have been a "picnic" outdoor punch/pot strainer. Used to removed to remove leafs, bugs and other stuff from a bowl/pot. Also the "1776" makes me think about 4th of July "picnic". IP: Logged |
Polly Posts: 1970 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Yes, I would be more confident that the date referred to the spoon's origin if it were any other year! On the other hand, if 1776 is a patriotic inscription rather than a date of manufacture/gift/whatever, that suggests the piece is American... Not knowing things is so frustrating--but I'm drawn to mysteries! IP: Logged |
Paul Lemieux Posts: 1792 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I think the + is just a decorative spacing element and that it reads "PETER STEHELI". A quick google search located one Peter Steheli christened in Switzerland...but in 1792. So I'm not sure if it's the same person (would somebody born in 1776 be christened 16 years later?). So maybe that's a dead-end, but to me the style of design looks more continental than American. IP: Logged |
All times are ET | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() ![]() |
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a
1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums. 2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development). 3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post. |
copyright © 1993 - 2022
SM Publications
All Rights Reserved. Legal & Privacy Notices |