SMP Logo
SM Publications
Silver Salon Forums - The premier site for discussing Silver.
SMP | Silver Salon Forums | SSF - Guidelines | SSF - FAQ | Silver Sales

The Silver Salon Forums
Since 1993
Over 11,793 threads & 64,769 posts !!
Continental / International Silver Forum
How to Post Photos REGISTER (click here)

customtitle open  SMP Silver Salon Forums
tlineopen  Continental / International Silver
tline3open  faked 18th-c. French discharge marks

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

ForumFriend SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   faked 18th-c. French discharge marks
akgdc

Posts: 289
Registered: Sep 2001

iconnumber posted 07-31-2006 12:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for akgdc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
To respond to a query in another thread, here are images of the marks on a fake 18th-century French "coupe de mariage." The maker was a prolific faker, especially of these wedding cups, wine tasters, etc., and is included in the "Faux Poincons" section of Jacques Helft's book.

The 1780s Paris "poincon de decharge" (appearing here next to an apparently genuine Minerve mark) is not at all badly done, especially given its small size. It is better executed than the larger hallmarks on the other side of the cup, I'd say.

IP: Logged

DB

Posts: 252
Registered: May 2006

iconnumber posted 07-31-2006 12:33 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for DB     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
akdgdc, I have found it - thanks so much.

In this connection I have a question - so many genuine old French pieces have the Minerve mark stamped in again - why and when was this done.

Something similar seems to happen in Austria - modern Austrian marks are stamped twice on old pieces which came into the trade after the war.

Your advice please,

------------------
Dorothea Burstyn

IP: Logged

akgdc

Posts: 289
Registered: Sep 2001

iconnumber posted 07-31-2006 01:23 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for akgdc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
French law (not always enforced, I suspect, and in any case no longer in effect today) was that a piece had to be reassayed if it was put up for sale. Many genuine 18th-c. French pieces also have a 19th-c. Minerve mark. I also have a pair of 18th-c. plates that have been re-marked with 1819-38 provincial hallmarks.

IP: Logged

DB

Posts: 252
Registered: May 2006

iconnumber posted 07-31-2006 01:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for DB     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks so much for the quick and good reply. Learned something.

------------------
Dorothea Burstyn

IP: Logged

Kayvee

Posts: 204
Registered: Oct 2004

iconnumber posted 07-31-2006 03:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Kayvee     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
What I find to be the most helpful guideline in studying marks on 18th C French silver is that there should be concordance between the marks. For example, a piece with a charge mark for Paris 1785 should have a discharge mark is use at that date (a dog’s head facing left on large objects) and obviously the date letter that corresponds to 1785 for Paris (one of 3 possible crowned P’s). Also the maker’s mark should be for someone working in Paris during that time period. If these don’t line up as they should, loud bells should go off. Even if these marks are in proper concordance, the object could have been faked in other ways, but that is another story. Other marks you might find are those for the “recenses” or recounts that took place in 1797, 1809, 1819, and 1838 when there were major changes to the marking system. Anyone owning silver was required to bring their silver in for re-marking. Of course not everyone did, but the “recense” marks often are found. The mark for the 1797 recount is the head of Marianne on large objects. She faces right for Paris and left for the provinces. Finding recense marks on 18th C French silver can be a useful indicator of authenticity. There are over 400 18th C marks for Paris alone, not counting maker’s marks, so it is not surprising that we get confused today. This complicated system was meant to protect the public, but I believe it has given many opportunities for the unscrupulous to hoodwink buyers today.

IP: Logged

All times are ET

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a


1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums.
Click here to Register for a Free password

2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development).

3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post.


| Home | Order | The Guide to Evaluating Gold & Silver Objects | The Book of Silver
| Update BOS Registration | Silver Library | For Sale | Our Wants List | Silver Dealers | Speakers Bureau |
| Silversmiths | How to set a table | Shows | SMP | Silver News |
copyright © 1993 - 2022 SM Publications
All Rights Reserved.
Legal & Privacy Notices