SMP Logo
SM Publications
Silver Salon Forums - The premier site for discussing Silver.
SMP | Silver Salon Forums | SSF - Guidelines | SSF - FAQ | Silver Sales

In this Forum we discuss the silver of the United Kingdom, as well as British Colonial silver and Old Sheffield Plate.

Past British - Irish Sterling topics/threads worth a look.

How to Post Photos

Want to be a Moderator?
customtitle open  SMP Silver Salon Forums
tlineopen  British / Irish Sterling
tline3open  No town mark and no maker's mark!

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

ForumFriend SSFFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   No town mark and no maker's mark!
Leo Passant

Posts: 24
Registered: Dec 2005

iconnumber posted 01-15-2007 06:48 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Leo Passant     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
[26-1316]

I have a couple of English casters c1797 that have extremely clear and well defined duty, year and sterling marks yet they bear no town or maker's marks.

The lack of town marks isn't of great surprise as I have many small items and pieces of (mostly provincial British) flatware without town marks.

The casters show little sign of use with little wear. They are London made and of very high quality and I was wondering why the maker wouldn't want to add his (her?) mark to such fine pieces.

On such relatively large items with abundant space, why would the assay office not strike the town mark in sequence with the other marks?

What would be the possible reasons for a silversmith not marking their wares?

IP: Logged

Silver Lyon

Posts: 363
Registered: Oct 2004

iconnumber posted 01-15-2007 08:32 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Silver Lyon     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
In order to help you we need to see pictures of these pieces and their marks - also thge marks on their lids, please.

IP: Logged

Leo Passant

Posts: 24
Registered: Dec 2005

iconnumber posted 01-15-2007 02:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Leo Passant     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The point is, the marks I'm interested in are non-existent. Actually, the lack of duty marks isn't really a concern for London pieces of this date, but I don't understand why the maker's mark is absent.

The marks on the tops and bases are the pre-1822 lion passant. The bases also have duty marks and the letters B for London 1797.

If you're still insistent on photos, I'll borrow a camera this evening and post the photos tonight.

IP: Logged

Leo Passant

Posts: 24
Registered: Dec 2005

iconnumber posted 01-15-2007 07:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Leo Passant     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Pictures! The first is of the mark on the top and the second picture is of the marks on the base.


IP: Logged

Clive E Taylor

Posts: 450
Registered: Jul 2000

iconnumber posted 01-16-2007 12:36 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Clive E Taylor     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I personally have a doubt about these marks. The George Head Duty Mark looks as if he's had his neck bent backward and the Lion Passant looks if it is Passant, not Passant Guardant as it should be if the piece is pre - 1822. The date - letter "B" is appropriate with a George Head without cusps in London only for 1797.
The dateletter looks as if it has been struck twice- one element being perhaps a "P".
I may have misread the photos - which often can mislead but I think this may perhaps be - an odd provincial mark - an early 19th century psuedo mark - or worse.

IP: Logged

doc

Posts: 730
Registered: Jul 2003

iconnumber posted 01-16-2007 12:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for doc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I tend to agree with Clive-the shape of the cartouche around the Lion Passant is also strange-the lower "tail seems exaggerated to me.

A photo of the entire piece would be helpful.

IP: Logged

Leo Passant

Posts: 24
Registered: Dec 2005

iconnumber posted 01-16-2007 04:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Leo Passant     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The second caster shows a perfect, more defined B, and the lion's cartouche isn't as distorted. The marks fall right on the ogee part of the foot, so they appear somewhat mishapen. The striker obviously had problems getting clear imprints, as there's the feintest outline of the exact same punch just visible around one of the lions.

I have no doubt the date Bs are OK. One of the duty marks is slightly distorted, but the lions passant are odd and can't be explained by double striking.
As to the lack of maker's marks anyione?

IP: Logged

salmoned

Posts: 336
Registered: Jan 2005

iconnumber posted 01-16-2007 05:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for salmoned     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The problem with the lion passant is that it appears not to be guardant. The missing city mark was not uncommon for London during that period, especially for small work. The missing sponsor's mark can be caused by numerous events - lightly struck and worn off, worked off after assay, etc. It is a bit odd that both sponsor's marks are entirely missing, but not extremely so.

[This message has been edited by salmoned (edited 01-16-2007).]

IP: Logged

vathek

Posts: 966
Registered: Jun 99

iconnumber posted 01-18-2007 09:08 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for vathek     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
would like to see photos of the entire piece. May be Chinese export.

IP: Logged

Kimo

Posts: 1652
Registered: Mar 2003

iconnumber posted 01-18-2007 03:25 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Kimo     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The marks do not seem to be quite right for what they are purporting to be. Whenever this is the case, it is important to keep an open mind about exactly what you may or may not have given the sad situation these days that there is no shortage of spuriously marked pieces of silver floating around ranging from ones created long ago in an effort to get around hallmarking requirements of the day to ones done more recently to give an object a greater value.

IP: Logged

All times are ET

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a


1. Public Silver Forums (open Free membership) - anyone with a valid e-mail address may register. Once you have received your Silver Salon Forum password, and then if you abide by the Silver Salon Forum Guidelines, you may start a thread or post a reply in the New Members' Forum. New Members who show a continued willingness to participate, to completely read and abide by the Guidelines will be allowed to post to the Member Public Forums.
Click here to Register for a Free password

2. Private Silver Salon Forums (invitational or $ donation membership) - The Private Silver Salon Forums require registration and special authorization to view, search, start a thread or to post a reply. Special authorization can be obtained in one of several ways: by Invitation; Annual $ Donation; or via Special Limited Membership. For more details click here (under development).

3. Administrative/Special Private Forums (special membership required) - These forums are reserved for special subjects or administrative discussion. These forums are not open to the public and require special authorization to view or post.


| Home | Order | The Guide to Evaluating Gold & Silver Objects | The Book of Silver
| Update BOS Registration | Silver Library | For Sale | Our Wants List | Silver Dealers | Speakers Bureau |
| Silversmiths | How to set a table | Shows | SMP | Silver News |
copyright © 1993 - 2022 SM Publications
All Rights Reserved.
Legal & Privacy Notices